A single prompt gets a single point of view, and you won't know what it left out. Researchers who work a topic properly ask it from several angles before they trust an answer: what would a practitioner say, what would a skeptic say, what would someone who's been burned by this say.
The fix is cheap: before you research anything, spend one turn generating 4-5 different expert perspectives on the question, each with its own angle of attack. You're not asking the model to answer yet — you're asking it to figure out what's worth asking.
Run the seed, then look at the perspectives it generates. Notice which one you wouldn't have thought of yourself — that's the one doing the actual work of catching your blind spot.